A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national notice following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, look for to build their family home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven citizens. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment with a Specific Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result regions are subject matter to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological consequences, specifically in the delicate coastal atmosphere like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their preparing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partly designed, is in the correct posture. Their authorized workforce has characterised the action as an try and delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding in an effort to preserve their look at, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal scheduling disputes, where views of the sea are the two really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic efforts with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-substantial drinking water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions, a picture that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity in the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they were meant to Collect visual proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Occasions reported, describing how the two Males entered the water for the duration of significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location grew to become The most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely noted that this kind of actions were cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became commonly searched phrases as visitors sought to know the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard even more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders need to be granted to halt construction pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute in the legal timeline.
At the Main with the dispute is really a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and problems attached to your authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is determined by issue for environmental protection and adherence to planning law. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting alternatively that it is about making certain that improvement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their very long-standing relationship to the realm and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair merely looking to produce a loved ones property in accordance Together with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches over a Specific Spot of Conservation and say that every one will work are carried out depending on Skilled guidance and authorized designs. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include getting into the sea during a storm, tend not to alter the underlying information.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how preparing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal web page has become a shorthand description for just a condition that many observers see as progressively prevalent. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation concerning private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times write-up about René Collier noted the businessman experienced Beforehand been involved in nearby advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from very distinct Specialist backgrounds can find on their own aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are getting to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-high water all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Periods are phrases that appeared regularly in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality on the coastline as well as the symbolic nature of your act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme tactic.
As the High Court proceedings go on, the end result continues to be unsure. The court must figure out whether or not the wall as built complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Special Region of Conservation has occurred. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and scheduling disorders. Nevertheless the human ingredient remains central: neighbours who ought to Dwell along with one another very long following the lawful charges happen to be paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around building functions at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, however the implications of the case lengthen further than that address. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Additionally, it underscores how swiftly a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental challenges which include environmental security and residence legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a place of purely natural natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall Rene Collier on the centre of the dispute stands partially built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized inquiries. Irrespective of whether it can in the end be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will likely continue to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.