A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among prospective neighbours about the construction of a wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national awareness next an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives property at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Situations post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to build their family dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established inhabitants. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their site, resulting in an encroachment on a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper position. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, in which views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-high h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times, an image which includes considering that turn into emblematic in the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and ailments hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as a substitute that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply seeking to create a relatives home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accredited options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how organizing disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute in excess of construction of wall at coastal web site has grown to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion René Collier and Paul Feely intensifies, the exact delineation in between non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-significant water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether the wall as built complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who need to live together with one another very long following the legal expenditures are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the case prolong past that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible carry on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.